About Me

Name: Daniel Neff
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

  • YES!
    Can we keep this...
    ApolloSpeaks

Blog Roll

 

Why the family is so important to all of us

 

Let me say first that I am not condemning anyone who is divorced, and I know that divorce will continue to happen. These are just my observations on the issue of divorce and it's consequences. While I can't say what the divorce rate is and whether it is on the rise or decline (divorce statistics are harder to find than a positive review of a Ben Affleck movie), it is safe to say that divorce remains a major problem in this country. My observation on this issue is not about the ethics or morality of divorce, but it's effects on the children, and by association, it's effects on all of us (as it effects society).

The following is a commentary by Alexis de Tocqueville about American public life (in comparison to European public life, circa 1835). His comments are very interesting.

 "Agitated by the tumultuous passions which frequently disturb his dwelling, the European is galled by the obedience which the legislative powers of the State exact. But when the American retires from the turmoil of public life to the bosom of his family, he finds in it the image of order and of peace. There his pleasures are simple and natural, his joys are innocent and calm; and as he finds that an orderly life is the surest path to happiness, he accustoms himself without difficulty to moderate his opinions as well as his tastes. Whilst the European endeavors to forget his domestic troubles by agitating society, the American derives from his own home that love of order which he afterwards carries with him into public affairs."


It would be reasonable to substitute "home marred by divorce" for "European", and "home not marred by divorce" for American, in regards to the above commentary.
"the (child from a home marred by divorce) endeavors to forget his domestic troubles by agitating society"
The contrast is stark. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that youth from a stable home are going to be better behaved than youth from a home that is racked with strife. But the point is that a stable home is just one where mom and dad are there, committed to one another, committed to their children. It doesn't have to be Ward and June Cleaver (from "Leave it to Beaver"). It doesn have to be perfecct. Having worked with troubled youth and their families for nearly 20 years, I think I can comment with some degree of credibility on this issue. The vast majority of teens we have worked with that are "troubled", juvenile offenders, struggling in school, come from broken homes. There have been scant few troubled teens that have come from a home where the original mom and dad are still together and in the home. These kids either live in a single-parent household, or they live with mom and the live-in boyfriend-of-the-month. Of course my experience is not exhaustive (I have not worked with every single troubled teen), but it is a valid sample.

We have even worked with youth, whose parents were together, but in and out of separation/talking of divorce. These youth would do well when mom and dad were working it out and together, but when mom and dad would separate or things would get heated, the youth would struggle. Then, when mom and dad would start to work things out again, the youth would exhibit positive behaviors. The effects of the tranquility of the home on the children cannot be overstated. Of course all couples have good days and bad days, and no marriage is going to be like a fairy tale, but a home where mom and dad are present and committed to staying together is always better than a broken home. Kids get their sense of self from their family. If their family is fractured, they feel it. Kids need that sense of wholeness in their home as a base for them to discover who they are. Lawyers and Psychologists will tell parents, “the kids will be okay, kids are resilient, they're better off in a broken home than one where the parents fight all the time”. I have heard people who got divorced say they regret listening to that kind of advice. Kids are always (99% of the time) better off with mom and dad together.

Marriage is not an easy thing. If it were, the vows would say "for better, richer, and in health, I will stay with you". But that's not the way the vows read, is it? "For better or worse, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health....til death do us part".


I think part of the problem is expectations. People have unrealistic expectations of marriage in a lot of cases.
I am reminded of a Don Henley song (End of the Innocence), where he says,

And happily ever after fails,

and we've been poisoned by these fairy tales,

the lawyers dwell on small details,

since daddy had to fly”

I think what he is saying is that people listen to songs or watch romantic movies (fairy tales) and get this impression that when they fall in love and get married, they will live in this fairy tale of bliss and harmony. Then, when they find out that real life is not like that, they give up, assuming that they just married the wrong person. People need to go into marriage with the right perspective and expectations. People need to realize going into marriage that it takes work, commitment, and a willingness to forgive one another. I think if public schools spent time educating kids about marriage and responsibility (instead of how to have sex), our society would be much better off (but don't get me started on that soap box). (This could be done without teaching from a religious perspective)

Another factor contributing to the divorce rate is the fact that people are so mobile anymore (moving from place to place), that they no longer have the parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles nearby to counsel them when they begin to have marital problems. The advice of an older person who has been there, experienced tough times (but worked it out and can honestly tell them that it is worth the effort to make their marriage work) is priceless. That is something most of don't have any longer. Without the advice and modeling of family, people are left to take their cue from others in their community, tv, movies. And in these cases people are inundated with the message "Everyone is getting divorced, you might as well get divorced too."
This commentary is not about the morality of divorce, but the destructive effects that we all feel. From troublemakers in school, to juvenile offenders, to adult crimes, so many of the things that disrupt us from enjoying life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness could be reduced simply by repairing the family unit. So many of the ills of our society could be cured simply by returning to a commitment to family..."til death do us part".
 
"when _________ retires from the turmoil of public life to the bosom of his family, he finds in it the image of order and of peace"


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can we keep this Republic?

More than any other time of year, this is when we reflect on the birth of this great (once great?) nation. July 4th marks the anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. The most amazing document in the history of man. While it is an overused phrase, the founding fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew what people have done to the republic they created. Then again, they (much more than most in this generation) understood human behavior. Someone asked Benjamin Franklin (after the constitution was drawn up)Well Doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" "A republic if you can keep it" responded Franklin.
And this is NOT, a democrat problem or a republican problem, it is a result of corrupt politicians, people who have not been educated adequately in the heritage of this nation, and......human nature. Congress, and presidents (past and current) have overstepped their constitutional authority and done things, that while they may have seemed like "good things" to do, were in principle, WRONG!
Alexander Tytler, a Scottish-born British lawyer and writer, wrote about the phases a democracy usually goes through, and it usually ends, after about 200 years, in bondage such as a dictatorship.
 
Tytler listed the phases as follows (source wikipedia)
 
  • From bondage to spiritual faith;
  • From spiritual faith to great courage;
  • From courage to liberty;
  • From liberty to abundance;
  • From abundance to complacency;
  • From complacency to apathy;
  • From apathy to dependence;
  • From dependence back into bondage.
     
  • Now of course, this is the opinion of a man, based on his study of history, and is therefore not exhaustive nor absolute truth, but it is useful for discussion. Going by this list of progression, I would say we are somewhere in the "apathy to dependence" phase. With all of our accomplishments in the 20th century we became complacent. That has been followed in the last 30 years with a march toward apathy. People have come to the place where most feel their vote doesn't count and the representatives don't listen to their voice. We are at a critical juncture in our history. We can beat this "inevitable?" progression to bondage, and it appears that many people are ready to rise to the challenge. The Tax Day Tea Parties are evidence of that. Despite the efforts of the lunatic left wing fringe on some networks to discredit good people getting out and making their voice heard, these tea parties have stirred (or shown evidence of an already existing stirring of) that indomitable American spirit that is unique in the history of human government. People are meeting all across this nation to find ways to change the course of this nation, and help stave off tyranny. Some states have starting passing gun legislation and daring the federal government to overstep it's constitutional limits to undo the legislation. Some states have talked about secession. Let's hope it doesn't come to that, but I think there needs to be a willingness to take that direction if the federal government refuses to stay within the constitution. I don't think anyone wants a violent revolt, most people just want this government to be once again, "a government of the people, by the people, and for the people".
     
    Let's hope that Lincoln was right, and this wasn't just wishful thinking:
     
    "and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. "
     
     
  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous1Next »